tom boone dot com
Excavating the grey area between pop culture and reality...

The Blog : February 2008

Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 9:38pm

Sunday was Hollywood's big night, and as always I was glued to my television from mid-afternoon onward. I don't want to call the awards show boring, but while Jon Stewart did a fine job hosting, the overall broadcast was just a bit too, well, boring. With one exception ("Falling Slowly" from Once by Glen Hansard and Markéta Irglová), the best song nominees were spectacularly dull, and the canned montages before each of the big awards grew tiresome. The latter flaw, of course, was due to the recently resolved writers' strike. The show's producers prepared these reviews of past winners when there was a real chance no writers would be allowed to prepare material for the broadcast. Jon Stewart's Daily Show scribes did manage to cull a decent amount of gags in about a week, but some of the preproduced material was left in for padding.

Ironically, the show's highlight came during the presentation of the Best Song award. Hansard and Irglová walked to the stage to a warm reception from the Hollywood crowd. After Hansard gave his thanks, the band started playing, cutting off Irglová before she could utter a single word. After the next commercial break, Stewart took the unprecedented step of asking Irglová to return to the stage to speak. A truly classy gesture from the Oscar host. (Hopefully, the win for Once will mean a bigger audience for this amazing little film.)

As you've probably heard by now, the night's big winner was No Country for Old Men, which took home four statues, including Best Picture and Supporting Actor (Javier Bardem). Blockbuster action movie The Bourne Ultimatum surprised everyone by bagging three awards, though all were in technical categories. Both actress categories were minor upsets, with Marion Cotillard beating Julie Christie in Best Actress, while Tilda Swinton bested Cate Blanchett and Amy Ryan in the supporting field. Otherwise, the big awards went exactly as all the pundits had predicted.

So how did I do with my annual punditry? Not too well. I got only 14 of 24 categories correct. Last year, in a set of unpublished picks, I got 20 right. Two years ago I picked 18 and the year before that 15. Thus, this year marks a low point for me. I got burned by my prediction that Transformers would win three Oscars and Michael Clayton none. Instead, the giant robots were shut out, and Swinton made sure that Clayton got its due. Fine with me.

Here all the nights winners, along with a tally of which categories I got right and wrong:

Picture: No Country for Old Men
Actress: Marion Cotillard - La Vie en Rose (My pick: Julie Christie)
Actor: Daniel Day Lewis - There Will Be Blood
Supporting Actress: Tilda Swinton - Michael Clayton (My pick:  Amy Ryan)
Supporting Actor: Javier Bardem - No Country for Old Men
Director: Joel Coen & Ethan Coen - No Country for Old Men
Adapted Screenplay: No Country for Old Men
Original Screenplay: Juno
Cinematography: There Will Be Blood
Editing: The Bourne Ultimatum (My pick: No Country for Old Men)
Art Direction: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Costume Design: Elizabeth: The Golden Age (My pick: Sweeney Todd)
Original Score: Atonement
Original Song: "Falling Slowly" - Once
Makeup: La Vie En Rose
Sound Mixing: The Bourne Ultimatum (My pick: Transformers)
Sound Editing: The Bourne Ultimatum (My pick: Transformers)
Visual Effects: The Golden Compass (My pick: Transformers)
Animated Feature: Ratatouille
Foreign Language Film: The Counterfeiters
Documentary Feature: The Taxi to the Dark Side (My pick: No End in Sight)
Documentary Short: Freeheld
Animated Short Film: Peter & the Wolf (My pick: I Met the Walrus)
Live Action Short Film: Le Mozart des Pickpockets (My pick: The Tonto Woman)

Awards, Movies, Oscars
(0)
Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - 3:09pm

A few minutes ago, while trying to help a colleague create a web page in a proprietary Content Management System, I finally had to advise her to compose her complicated page of tabular data in Dreamweaver and then paste the resulting HTML code into the CMS text editor. And I feel very, very dirty.

So why would I make such a bizarre recommendation? Well, for starters, unless you add a border or background color to a table's cells, the CMS text editor doesn't outline the cells at all. So trying to insert your cursor into the row and column you want to edit is a bit like trying to pick a door on "Let's Make a Deal."

Truth be told, the way such complex pages should work in a CMS-driven site is that there should be a template in place so that all a user had to do is enter her data into a form containing only plain text fields. Upon hitting the "Submit" button, the data record she just entered should automatically be displayed, along with all other records of the same type, in a table based on the template we already created. The content provider never has to worry about formatting the table once it's been defined in the template.

Hmmm... that sounds a lot like CCK, Views and Themes in Drupal.

Is the proprietary CMS capable of doing the same thing? Probably. Does anybody have a clue how to do it? Nope. Do I already know how to do it in Drupal? You bet.

By the way, have I mentioned that tom boone dot com is powered with Drupal? Ah, home sweet home.

(0)
Tuesday, February 19, 2008 - 8:14pm

As longtime readers of No True Bill know, I love making my annual Oscar predictions. A few weeks ago, I posted prognostications of who would be nominated in several of the big categories. I did pretty well, getting all 5 right in the Best Supporting Actor category, 4 right each in the Best Picture, Best Actor and Best Supporting Actress categories, and only 3 right in the Best Actress category. In total, I got 20 out of 25 picks correct.

Well, the big show is Sunday night, which means it's time to pick winners in every single category. As everyone seems to agree, it should be a big night for No Country for Old Men, and the Coen brothers could make history if they win in all 4 categories in which they're nominated -- Best Picture (as the film's producers), Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Editing (under their pseudonym Roderick Jaynes). That's because no one has ever won 4 Oscars for the same movie. In addition, if they win Best Director, they will be only the second directing team to pick up the trophy, following Robert Wise and Jerome Robbin's win for 1961's West Side Story.

Without further ado, here are my picks:

Picture: No Country for Old Men
Actress: Julie Christie - Away From Her
Actor: Daniel Day Lewis - There Will Be Blood
Supporting Actress: Amy Ryan - Gone Baby Gone
Supporting Actor: Javier Bardem - No Country for Old Men
Director: Joel Coen & Ethan Coen - No Country for Old Men
Adapted Screenplay: No Country for Old Men
Original Screenplay: Juno
Cinematography: There Will Be Blood
Editing: No Country for Old Men
Art Direction: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Costume Design: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Original Score: Atonement
Original Song: "Falling Slowly" - Once
Makeup: La Vie En Rose
Sound Mixing: Transformers
Sound Editing: Transformers
Visual Effects: Transformers
Animated Feature: Ratatouille
Foreign Language Film: The Counterfeiters
Documentary Feature: No End in Sight
Documentary Short: Freeheld
Animated Short Film: I Met the Walrus
Live Action Short Film: The Tonto Woman

Yes, that's right. I'm predicting that Transformers will win 3 Academy Awards and Michael Clayton will win none. No one is sadder about this than me.

These are my picks for who I think will win. Who would I actually like to see win? For Best Picture, my personal favorite is There Will Be Blood. I loved Juno would love to see Ellen Page take home the best actress prize. In the Best Supporting Actor category, I thought Tom Wilkinson was brilliant in Michael Clayton. The two nominees I'd like to see win most are actually two I've picked to win: Best Supporting Actress Amy Ryan (Gone Baby Gone) and Best Song "Falling Slowly" (Once - Watch the performance here).

Awards, Movies, Oscars
(0)
Sunday, February 17, 2008 - 9:00pm

Having decided to use this site as my new blogging headquarters, it raised some interesting questions about what to do with the archives from my other blogs. I have over three years worth of posts at No True Bill and another couple years at Library Laws. This amounts to roughly 500 posts. While I have no interest in keeping those sites around, there are a lot of posts -- and comments -- that I'd like to preserve.

With that in mind, I decided to migrate all the posts that I want to keep onto this site. In fact, posts from No True Bill are already here. Library Laws should follow soon. But these archives won't be complete. After importing NTB, I deleted about a third of the posts. For better or worse, I felt there was simply no value to be had in keeping a post that announced I'd take a short break from blogging in May 2005. And while it was fun at the time, that quiz I took in 2006 that told me which Led Zeppelin song I most resembled really serves no real purpose on this site.

A big part of this decision to manitain only a partial archive is the fact that my name now sits in both the title and URL of this site. When I started NTB, I hid my identity (though a clever investgator would've had little trouble figuring out who I was). Now, however, I intend for this site to be part of my "first life" identity. So if a prospective employer Googles me, they'll probably find this site. Given that possibility, a post entitled "Katie Couric Is an Idiot," while incredibly insightful, might not be the exact tone I want for tom boone dot com.

Library Laws, on the other hand, will see far less excision. After all, that was a professional blog, and my name was included on it quite prominently. While a post advertising a long ago filled librarian position might be removed, my writing from that site will remain intact.

Of course an additional wrinkle to that transition is that posts written by LL's other author, Josh, will not become part of this archive but will instead most likely move to his own blog, meaning that site will see its archives split between two separate websites.

The biggest remaining problem I foresee, however, is broken links. Once these old sites come down in a month or two, anyone who linked to NTB and LL will find themselves no longer pointing to their intended posts. Despite the broken links, the information they cited will actually still be available here, but the connection forever severed. While that's unfortunate, my biggest reason for maintaing these archives wasn't necessarily to keep such links intact. Instead, what I really want is for search engines to find one of my relevant posts when someone needs it, regardless of where it currently sits or where it once was. Say you want to know whether those rumors about a Pretty in Pink sequel were just a hoax, my answer will still be available. Or if you're curious about the pros and cons of using Pidgin and Adium to log into your Meebo IM account, I've still got you covered (internal link pending).

Archives, Blog
(2)
Syndicate content